Pen Review - Franklin Christoph Model 65

I admit, I'm usually the last one to the party, if I even show up at all.  (Metaphorically speaking, of course - if I actually have somewhere I have to be, I'll show up at least 10 minutes early...)  There was quite a bit of buzz last week about the FC Model 65, due to great reviews over on The Pen Addict and The Gentleman Stationer.  My review comes courtesy of my friend Paul loaning me his black Model 65, and if you want to skip all the wordy bits you can head down to the bottom of this post where there is a video, though it's not my best production since my autofocus was constantly being thwarted by the highly reflective finish on the pen.

Physical presence
Let's start with the obvious, at least what will be obvious if you get this pen in your hands - it is a loooooonnnggg pen.  This is because the Model 65 is meant to be a desk pen, which in general tend to be longer in order to be more comfortable for longer writing sessions.  Luckily, it is also quite a light pen, so the extended length does not become unwieldy in any way.

L to R: Lamy Safari, Model 65, TWSBI Vac 700

As you can see in the picture above, the Model 65 is just a bit longer than the Vac 700, which is the largest pen I own and certainly not a lightweight at all.  The real feeling of the size of this pen can be seen when it is uncapped, where you can see that most of the length of the pen is in the body:

Head and shoulders above the rest

This pen does indeed post and because the cap is so short and the pen itself so light and well balanced, I found that posting did not throw off the balance of the pen at all.

I am pretty sure that the Model 65 is made from acrylic, and while it is polished to be very shiny, this pen is not slick to hold.  The material has a bit of grip to it, in a way that is hard to describe in words.  Just know that this pen never felt slippery to me, though I do not have especially sweaty hands.

Being a desk pen, the Model 65 is clipless since you don't need a clip for a pen that will never be clipped to anything...  I happen to not be the biggest fan of the aesthetics of a clipless pen, but a nice feature that was included on this one is a flattened side on the body of the pen, so that you never need to worry about things rolling away and landing nib down, as we know nice things are wont to do.  You can see this in the very first picture of the post, as well as the name of the pen engraved in said flat spot.  The engraving is very subtle when not seen in direct light, and I think the whole presentation is a very classy way of branding a pen.

Writing experience
The Model 65 takes #5 nibs, so I'm assuming that you could swap in a lot of vintage or modern nibs of that size.  However, given the huge selection of nibs that Franklin Christoph offers, including custom grinds from Mike Masuyama, I doubt you would need to do searching elsewhere to find a nib that fits your style.

The nib I tried was a basic steel M.  It was not the best nib I've ever used, but it was pleasant, smooth, and reliable, so I can't complain.  Given that even the most "boring" nib I could have used was not disappointing in any way, I would have great confidence in future FC nibs.

The section of the Model 65 has a slight hourglass shape which combines perfectly with that slight "stickiness" of the material to really lock your fingers into place and make writing very stress-free.  There is also no concern of threads getting in the way, since FC does a neat little trick of putting them at the nib end of the section, thus allowing users to hold the pen as high or low as they want and never having fingers rub on threads (though they are quite smooth on this pen anyway, so it wouldn't be an issue regardless of placement).

Filling system
Not too much to say here - this is a cartridge/converter pen, that takes standard international sizes.  Given that there are no metal parts other than the nib, you can also use it as an eyedropper and given the huge size of the pen, I would be that eyedroppering it would give a giant capacity suitable to starting the draft of an epic novel.

Closing thoughts
I like this pen.  I don't really have a need for a desk pen, but if I did I would seriously consider one of these.  My biggest problem is the cost, which I guess is a common theme around here?  It's not that I think all pens are overpriced, but this particular pen with a steel nib will run you $150, and it goes up from there if you want a gold or custom ground nib.  And for that price you are getting into other pens that come with a gold nib as a default and are also quality products (I'm thinking Pilot here, as well as a few Lamy pens).  

However, if you are in the market for a desk pen, chances are you are not looking for a "budget" item because, well, a desk pen is not the pinnacle of convenience for all-purpose use.  If that's the case, I would definitely recommend this as a desk pen, and I am hoping that when I go to the DC pen show this summer, I will be able to check out some of the other finishes that might be a bit flashier than the basic black.

And, if all those words were not quite enough (or if it was too many words), here is the review in moving picture form:


Paper review - Field Notes Cherry Graph

Follow the spring 2014 Shelterwood limited edition, the Cherry Wood Field Notes brings woodgrain back into regular rotation.  For now it is a regular edition, but non-kraft regular editions have been known to disappear in the past so I will definitely be keeping an eye out for any announcements of this edition being discontinued so that I can stock up.

Field Notes Cherry Graph with a brown Pilot Juice

Size
This notebook is the standard “pocket size,” aka 3.5” by 5.5”, which happens to be my preferred size for a pocket notebook versus a passport size (which is just as wide but slightly shorter) or an A6 (which is slightly larger is both directions).  Still small enough to fit even in the tiny pockets on women's jeans while maximizing writing space within that constraint.  That said, these would not be my favorite notebooks to draft a novel in, but for carry-around-beat-em-up books they are ideal.

Binding
Field Notes uses a three staple saddle-stitch method to bind their books and this one is no exception.  It’s certainly not the most robust method ever, but it works.  If you are carrying these notebooks naked in your pocket for any extended length of time, it’s quite likely that at least one of the staples will lose its hold on the cover before you run out of blank pages, but my notebooks tend to be chauffeured around in a case of some sort and they have all survived just fine.  

Something extra special about the staples in this edition is that they are gold colored instead of the standard silver, and with the woodgrain cover they really make this feel like a luxury item rather than a stock edition.

Paper
One thing I really like about most Field Notes books is that they use bright white paper.  Sure, cream and soft white paper have their place, but I don’t like having the color of my writing muddled by the color of the paper and I have rejected many notebooks in the past for not having the right color of paper (Rhodia Webbie, I’m looking at you).

The grid in these notebooks is printed in a light brown, which they identify as “Double Knee Duck Canvas” in color.  I don’t know what that means, but it ties together well with the overall color scheme and walks the fine line between being dark enough to be useful while not being so dark as to be obtrusive.  Also, the 3/16” spacing works perfectly for my handwriting, especially in a pocket notebook where I’m not using fountain pens primarily.

The reason that I don’t use fountain pens much in this (and most Field Notes editions) is because the paper is not the most friendly to liquid inks.  Pens don’t feather much but they do bleed, even finer nibs, and I am too much of a tree-hugger to only use one side of each sheet.  I don’t mind that I am “forced” to use other quality pens like the Pilot Juice in here because then I don’t have to worry about dry times or waterproof-y-ness either.

Cover
Let’s be honest, the cover is really what makes this a special notebook.  And the cover is definitely something really special.  As far as I understand, it is made using the same process as the Shelterwood, where a super thin layer of real wood is glued to kraft paper and then viola, you have a wood grain cover!  Because of the natural origin of the wood veneer, no two covers will be identical and I really enjoy that aspect.  There is also a slight roughness to the covers, though it’s not like you will get splinters for from it.  But if you are a person who prefers a smooth notebook cover, this might not be for you.  They also have a tendency to curl outward, which means that for my use the notebooks don’t lay super flat, though I suspect that back pocket use could help to alleviate this.

Compared to the Shelterwoods cover (made out of cherry as well), I find these covers to be lighter in color and far more aesthetically pleasing, at least to me.  The first picture below is the Shelterwood and the second is the Cherry Graph:

Shelterwood cover

Shelterwood cover

Cherry Graph cover

I don’t have any Shelterwood notebooks to hold side-by-side with the Cherry Graph, so it could just be my poor memory playing tricks on me.  The scans look pretty similar, but it seems that I am not the only one who notices a color difference between the two.  Also, I think that they are lighter and more complex in real life than what the scans of the covers can do, so take the pictures with a grain of salt.  Another difference between the two editions is that the Shelterwood had white printing on the cover, while the Cherry Graph has the standard black.  I am relatively indifferent either way, as both colors look great on the woodgrain. 

Overall
I luuuuurrrrve these notebooks.  As long as they are a regular edition I plan to have one in active rotation and even after they are retired I will probably have stocked up on so many that I’ll be using them for years to come.  They give that special edition feel with the availability and price (3/$10) of a stock edition, and I think that is a combination that can’t be beat.